Decolonial Intersectional Theory of Authentic Climate Activist Voice

Section One: Introduction

1.1 Research Background and Significance

Macro Context

Global climate discourse suffers a persistent siloing crisis: mainstream environmentalism often isolates carbon emissions, renewable energy, and conservation from intertwined systems of colonial extraction, white supremacy, racial inequity, and exploitative capitalism. Mainstream climate campaigns frame the crisis as a purely technical ecological challenge, erasing the historical reality that wealthy nations and privileged populations bear most emissions burdens while Black, Indigenous, and Global Majority communities endure the worst climate harm. Youth and marginalized would-be activists frequently feel disempowered to speak up, trapped by two barriers: a narrow climate narrative that excludes their lived racial and diasporic identities, and widespread defeatism claiming individual voices carry no meaningful weight. Standard climate advocacy training centers technical policy knowledge alone, with no structured process to help activists anchor their advocacy in personal cultural lineage and systemic intersection analysis. Fehinti Balogun’s October 2022 TED Countdown talk How to find your voice for climate action resolves this gap by introducing the Interwoven Voice Framework, an artistic and activist methodology forged from his British-Nigerian diasporic experience, theater practice, and frontline climate organizing that unites intersectional systemic diagnosis, personal identity grounding, and creative collective voice-building.

Practical Significance

For grassroots climate organizers, youth educators, arts-based activists, corporate sustainability leads, and university climate groups, Balogun’s framework delivers a replicable three-stage practice to overcome climate disempowerment and craft authentic, impactful advocacy speech and creative work. Existing climate communication toolkits focus solely on carbon statistics and policy talking points, failing to address the root emotional barrier: many people stay silent because standard climate spaces erase their racial, colonial, and class lived realities. Balogun’s model merges spoken-word, theater, and systemic intersection analysis, giving marginalized and privileged practitioners alike a stepwise routine to connect personal identity to global climate systems, reject defeatist narratives, and build unified cross-community collective voice. The framework carries immediate utility for school climate clubs, youth summits, and arts activism collectives, filling a critical gap in accessible, identity-centered climate advocacy training.

Theoretical Significance

Existing environmental justice scholarship separates two critical strands: intersectional systemic analysis (colonialism, racial capitalism and climate harm) and narrative/voice-building activist practice, with almost no unified applied model that links structural diagnosis to individual and collective storytelling. Traditional climate communication theory prioritizes data persuasion and emotional framing without centering diasporic, racialized identity as the foundation of authentic advocacy voice. Balogun’s Interwoven Voice Framework integrates critical race environmental theory, decolonial climate thought, and participatory theater methodology into a single actionable system, filling a major cross-disciplinary knowledge gap. Unlike abstract academic intersectionality frameworks, his model translates systemic theory into creative, verbal, and organizing practice, creating a bridge between environmental justice academia and everyday grassroots activist expression.

1.2 Core Concept Definitions

Standard Definition of the Interwoven Voice Framework (Balogun’s Unified Model)

The Interwoven Voice Framework is a three-stage activist and artistic methodology that positions authentic climate voice as emerging from three inseparable layers: intersectional systemic diagnosis linking climate harm to colonial racial capitalism, rooted personal identity lineage work drawing on diasporic and lived experience, and creative collective voice co-creation. Its central thesis holds that climate change is merely a symptom of extractive white supremacist colonial systems; only voices that name these interconnections can unlock transformative collective climate solutions and dismantle widespread activist powerlessness.

Clarification of Easily Confused Concepts

1. Interwoven Climate Analysis vs. Single-Issue Environmentalism: Single-issue climate work isolates emissions and ecology from racism and colonialism; interwoven analysis traces every climate harm back to historical extractive colonial exploitation and racialized resource inequality.
2. Rooted Identity Voice vs. Generic Climate Speech: Generic advocacy relies on universal carbon data and scripted talking points; rooted voice draws on personal cultural, diasporic, class, and racial lived experience to frame climate stakes unique to marginalized communities.
3. Collective Voice Co-Creation vs. Individual Solo Activism: Solo climate speaking prioritizes single-person expert testimony; collective voice co-creation unites diverse lived perspectives to build unified cross-community advocacy messaging that avoids narrow privileged framing.
4. Defeatist Powerlessness Narrative vs. Reimagined Collective Possibility: The defeatist myth claims individual voices cannot shift global systems; Balogun’s reimagining lens centers generations of marginalized resistance to prove coordinated identity-rooted voice drives systemic climate policy change.

Scope and Boundaries of Discussion

This analysis centers the Interwoven Voice Framework as presented in Balogun’s 2022 TED Countdown talk, his theatrical work Can I Live?, and his COP26 youth organizing workshops. The framework applies to grassroots climate activism, youth climate education, arts-based environmental advocacy, and public climate speechwriting. It excludes purely technical policy lobbying that does not center identity and intersectional storytelling, though it can be paired with policy work to add equitable narrative framing. The model focuses on verbal and creative climate voice-building and does not replace direct on-the-ground protest or legislative organizing; it functions as a complementary communication foundation for all climate action.

1.3 Current Research Status, Domestic and International

Development History and Key Milestones

Decolonial environmental justice scholarship emerged in the late twentieth century, documenting colonial extraction as the foundational driver of the climate crisis, yet remained confined to academic journals with limited grassroots translation. Intersectionality theory from critical race studies was slowly adopted into environmental work by the 2010s, but no creative, practice-focused voice-building model existed to translate systemic theory into public advocacy speech. Balogun developed the core framework over five years of dual theater and climate organizing: his early work with actor climate groups uncovered widespread racialized disempowerment among BIPOC creatives who felt excluded from mainstream climate spaces. His digital spoken-word theater piece Can I Live? (2021) piloted the identity-system connection stage of the model, combining scientific climate data with diasporic personal narrative. The 2022 TED Countdown talk formalized the complete three-stage Interwoven Voice Framework for a global youth and creator audience, followed by standardized workshop curricula deployed at COP26, UK Parliament youth summits, and university climate programs across Europe.

Mainstream Viewpoints and Schools of Thought

Three dominant preexisting schools of climate communication and advocacy training:

1. Data-First Technical Climate School: Prioritize carbon metrics, policy proposals, and scientific evidence; minimize racial, colonial, and identity narrative as secondary emotional add-ons to core ecological messaging.
2. Isolated Environmental Justice School: Recognize racial climate inequity but separate systemic historical analysis from practical voice-building practice, offering academic theory without creative storytelling workflows for everyday activists.
3. Generic Youth Narrative School: Encourage personal climate storytelling without requiring intersectional systemic grounding, allowing privileged individual narratives to dominate climate discourse and erase colonial root causes.

Balogun’s Interwoven Voice Framework creates an integrative fourth school that requires systemic interconnection analysis as the mandatory foundation of all authentic climate voice, merging decolonial environmental theory, diasporic identity work, and participatory creative collective practice into one unified stepwise methodology.

Shortcomings and Controversies in Existing Research and Practice

Nearly all mainstream climate communication training omits decolonial intersectional analysis as a prerequisite for advocacy storytelling, producing narrow, ecocentric messaging that fails to resonate with Global Majority and racialized audiences. Environmental justice academia generates rigorous systemic critique but lacks accessible creative practice tools for young, non-academic activists to translate theory into public voice. A persistent industry controversy debates whether identity-centered narrative distracts from core carbon reduction policy demands; Balogun counters that ignoring colonial racial capitalism produces incomplete climate solutions that replicate existing extractive inequities. Additional gaps exist in standardized group co-creation protocols for cross-cultural climate collectives, which the Interwoven Voice Framework fully addresses via its third collective voice stage.

1.4 Framework and Core Objectives

Overall Logical Structure of the Article

This piece adopts a theory-focused article structure (Option A — Foundational Theory / System of Principles), aligned with Balogun’s core contribution: a complete intersectional decolonial theory linking systemic climate analysis, personal diasporic identity, and collective creative climate voice-building. Section One establishes global climate discourse siloing context, key terminology, and cross-disciplinary research gaps. Section Two dissects the framework’s origin and evolution, four core theoretical assumptions, three essential interconnected stages, classification of its two applied branches, and inherent applicable conditions and limitations. Section Three explores cross-sector implementation scenarios, widespread misinterpretations of the interwoven systemic thesis, and long-term practitioner guidance for climate educators and organizers. Section Four summarizes core theoretical conclusions and maps future decolonial climate communication trends, followed by formal academic references and all mandatory supplementary deliverables.

Core Research Question Answered

What unified three-stage decolonial methodology does Fehinti Balogun’s Interwoven Voice Framework establish to help marginalized and privileged activists craft authentic, transformative climate advocacy voice, and how does centering the interconnection of climate harm, colonialism, and racial capitalism resolve widespread youth climate disempowerment and silencing?

Key Takeaways for Readers

1. Climate change functions only as a symptom of white supremacist colonial extractive capitalism; authentic climate voice cannot exist without first mapping these interwoven systemic root causes.
2. Rooted personal diasporic and lived identity acts as the anchor for compelling, unignorable climate storytelling, countering generic data-only advocacy that erases marginalized lived climate harm.
3. Individual voice gains transformative power only through collective cross-community co-creation, uniting diverse identity perspectives to reject elite narrow climate narratives.
4. The framework scales from individual speechwriting and spoken-word creation to large youth summit collective advocacy campaigns, offering a replicable decolonial alternative to mainstream siloed climate communication training.

Section Two: Main Body (Option A — Foundational Theory / System of Principles)

2A.1 Origin and Evolution of the Interwoven Voice Framework

Balogun’s three-stage model evolved across three iterative creative and organizing phases shaped by his British-Nigerian diasporic lived experience and dual theater-climate career:

1. Diagnosis Seed Phase (2017–2019 Actor Climate Organizing): Working within UK actor unions, Balogun observed widespread silence among racialized creatives in climate spaces. Mainstream climate groups ignored colonial resource extraction and racial inequity, leaving BIPOC youth feeling their lived realities were invisible in climate discourse. This phase generated the core thesis: disempowerment and silence stem from climate discourse’s failure to name interconnected colonial-climate systems.
2. Identity Narrative Prototype Phase (2020–2021 Can I Live? Theater Production): Balogun built the framework’s second identity-rooted stage through his hybrid spoken-word, animation, and science performance piece. The work merged Nigerian diasporic family narrative with data on Shell’s colonial oil extraction in Nigeria, proving personal lineage storytelling humanizes abstract systemic climate harm for global audiences.
3. Complete Three-Stage Formalization Phase (2022 TED Countdown Talk + COP26 Workshops): Balogun codified the full Interwoven Voice Framework, adding the third collective co-creation stage to counter isolated solo activist storytelling. His TED presentation framed the model as a universal antidote to climate defeatism, outlining clear sequential stages linking systemic analysis, personal identity grounding, and unified collective voice-building for global youth climate creators and organizers.

2A.2 Core Assumptions and Fundamental Viewpoints

Assumption One: Climate crisis is a secondary symptom of colonial racial extractive capitalism

Ecological breakdown does not exist in isolation; it emerges from centuries of colonial resource theft, white supremacist resource hierarchies, and infinite-growth capitalist systems that prioritize elite profit over Global Majority human and planetary survival. Any climate voice that fails to name these interlocking systems remains incomplete and limited to incremental ecological fixes that perpetuate inequity.

Assumption Two: Personal diasporic and lived identity is the irreplaceable anchor of authentic climate voice

Generic data-driven advocacy speech lacks emotional and moral weight without grounding in individual lived experience of racial, class, or colonial climate harm. Marginalized identity storytelling reveals unseen climate inequities that universal scientific statistics cannot communicate to mainstream audiences. Privileged activists must also center their positional identity to avoid centering narrow elite climate narratives.

Assumption Three: Individual voice alone cannot dismantle systemic climate defeatism; collective cross-community co-creation is required

Solo testimony risks tokenization and fragmented messaging; unified collective voice built from diverse diasporic, racial, and class perspectives generates broad cultural momentum capable of shifting dominant climate discourse and policy priorities. Collective work also cures the widespread “nothing I can do” powerlessness narrative.

Assumption Four: Defeatist climate apathy is a systemic product of siloed, elite climate discourse, not individual character failure

People stay silent not from laziness or disinterest, but because mainstream climate spaces erase their lived systemic realities, creating a sense that their perspectives do not matter. Reimagining collective possibility requires centering histories of marginalized anti-extraction resistance to restore activist agency.

2A.3 Essential Components and Framework Model: The Three Interdependent Stages

Balogun’s framework operates as a mandatory sequential cycle where all three stages must be completed to generate transformative climate voice; skipping systemic analysis or collective co-creation produces shallow, incomplete advocacy messaging.

Stage One: Interwoven Systemic Diagnosis (Foundation Layer)

This mandatory opening stage requires mapping the three interconnected root systems driving climate harm: colonial extraction, systemic white supremacy, and extractive capitalism. Practitioners complete structured reflection tracing local climate impacts back to global historical resource theft (e.g., Nigerian oil extraction, Indigenous land dispossession). Core activities include mapping which communities pollute least yet suffer worst climate harm, identifying media erasure of Global Majority climate resistance, and rejecting the siloed separation of ecology and racial justice that dominates mainstream climate discourse. This stage eliminates the narrow technical climate framing that silences marginalized voices before storytelling begins.

Stage Two: Rooted Identity Narrative Grounding (Anchor Layer)

After systemic diagnosis, practitioners anchor their advocacy voice to personal diasporic, racial, class, or community lived experience. Balogun’s own anchor draws on his Nigerian-British family’s experience with colonial oil pollution and cultural pressure to pursue elite non-creative careers, framing his theater activism as a rejection of both colonial resource exploitation and narrow professional expectation. Core practice activities include spoken-word drafting, personal lineage reflection, and separating authentic lived narrative from generic climate talking points. This stage builds unignorable, emotionally resonant advocacy speech that centers invisible climate harm.

Stage Three: Collective Cross-Community Voice Co-Creation (Momentum Layer)

The final transformative stage unites diverse identity practitioners to merge individual rooted narratives into unified collective climate messaging. Facilitated group workshops combine varied diasporic, racial, and class perspectives to avoid single-group dominant narratives, crafting shared spoken-word, rallying language, and public testimony that reflects intersectional climate justice. This stage directly counters individual defeatism by demonstrating coordinated cross-community voice generates tangible systemic change, drawing on generations of Global Majority anti-extraction resistance as proof of collective power.

2A.4 Classification and Branches of the Interwoven Voice Framework

The theory splits into two distinct applied branches separated by individual versus group scale of climate voice creation:

1. Individual Creator Branch (Solo Speech, Spoken-Word, Personal Testimony) Streamlined three-stage workflow for solo activists, theater artists, educators drafting individual climate talks or creative work. Focuses on personal systemic reflection and identity narrative drafting, with optional small peer feedback groups for partial collective input. Balogun’s TED spoken-word segment and Can I Live? solo theatrical performance serve as benchmark examples for this branch.
2. Organizational Collective Branch (Youth Summits, Climate Clubs, Cross-Community Campaigns) Full group co-creation implementation model for large climate collectives, student organizations, and global youth summits. Includes structured multi-person systemic mapping workshops, identity narrative sharing circles, and collaborative unified messaging drafting protocols, designed to prevent privileged single-voice dominance in group advocacy. Balogun’s COP26 youth climate workshop curriculum represents the definitive organizational branch implementation.

A smaller micro-branch adapts the framework for K-12 and higher education climate classrooms, simplifying systemic diagnosis language for adolescent and student learning levels.

2A.5 Applicable Conditions and Limitations

Ideal Applicable Conditions

• Climate organizing spaces seeking to center decolonial, intersectional environmental justice and elevate racialized, diasporic youth voices.
• Arts-based climate activism (spoken word, theater, film, podcast storytelling) where creative narrative forms core advocacy output.
• Youth climate education programs addressing widespread activist disempowerment and climate apathy rooted in siloed elite climate discourse.
• Cross-cultural climate collectives aiming to avoid single-identity or privileged narrative dominance in public messaging.

Core Limitations of the Interwoven Voice Framework

1. Requires baseline decolonial and critical race literacy; practitioners with no prior education on colonial extractive systems struggle to complete Stage One systemic diagnosis without supplementary learning materials.
2. Less optimized for hyper-technical policy lobbying focused exclusively on carbon regulatory language, though it can be paired with policy work to add equitable narrative framing.
3. Resource barrier for large collective implementation: full cross-community co-creation workshops require trained facilitators and extended time commitments unavailable to underfunded small grassroots groups.
4. Primarily designed for verbal and creative climate voice-building; it does not provide direct tactical protest or legislative organizing steps, functioning only as a communication foundational methodology.

Section Three: Application and Implications

3.1 Practical Application Scenarios

Cross-Industry and Role-Specific Uses

• Youth Climate Education (High School / University): Integrate the three-stage cycle into environmental studies curricula and climate club programming to counter student disempowerment and center racial climate inequity narratives, mirroring Balogun’s UK parliamentary youth workshop model.
• Arts & Theater Climate Activists: Deploy the individual creator branch for spoken-word, digital performance, and documentary storytelling, as demonstrated in Balogun’s Can I Live? hybrid theater production linking diasporic identity and colonial oil extraction.
• Global Climate Summit Organizers (COP, TED Countdown): Use the organizational collective branch to draft unified youth opening testimony, ensuring cross-diasporic, cross-class representation in official summit public statements.
• Grassroots Environmental Justice Nonprofits: Run monthly systemic mapping and narrative co-creation workshops to diversify organizational public messaging beyond white ecocentric talking points.
• Corporate Sustainability Communications Teams: Adapt the individual framework to craft equitable stakeholder climate narratives that acknowledge colonial supply chain extraction harm, avoiding generic greenwashing data-only marketing language.

Adaptation Strategies for Different Group Sizes

• Individual solo creators (one person): Complete Stage One and Two independently, schedule small peer feedback circles for lightweight Stage Three collective input to avoid isolated echo-chamber storytelling.
• Small youth groups (three to fifteen participants): Run half-day sequential workshops moving from systemic mapping to identity sharing to short collective rally language drafting.
• Large summits / campus-wide climate collectives (twenty plus participants): Split into identity breakout circles for Stage Two narrative sharing, then reconvene as a full group for unified cross-community messaging co-creation in Stage Three.

3.2 Common Misconceptions and How to Avoid Them

Misconception One: The framework rejects scientific climate data entirely

Critics misread Balogun’s decolonial systemic focus as anti-science, claiming the model discards carbon and ecological evidence for identity storytelling alone.

• Avoidance principle: Clarify systemic diagnosis Stage One integrates climate science data with colonial extraction history; the framework only rejects siloed data-only messaging that erases racial and colonial root causes, not scientific evidence itself.

Misconception Two: Interwoven systemic analysis distracts from carbon reduction action

Organizers prioritize short-term emission policy wins and dismiss colonial racial capitalism diagnosis as a tangential ideological tangent slowing climate progress.

• Avoidance principle: Anchor implementation to Balogun’s core thesis: climate solutions that ignore extractive colonial systems replicate inequitable resource hierarchies, creating unjust climate transition policies that fail Global Majority communities long-term.

Misconception Three: Identity narrative equals tokenized personal anecdotes without systemic grounding

Practitioners skip Stage One systemic mapping and jump directly to personal storytelling, producing isolated individual anecdotes that lack structural context and fail to shift dominant climate discourse.

• Avoidance principle: Enforce Stage One as mandatory pre-work for all narrative creation; personal identity stories only gain transformative power when explicitly tied to interwoven colonial-capitalist climate systems.

Misconception Four: Collective voice co-creation means homogenizing all perspectives into a single generic statement

Group facilitators flatten diverse diasporic and class lived experiences to craft a single bland climate message, defeating the framework’s purpose of centering intersectional difference.

• Avoidance principle: Structure Stage Three co-creation to weave distinct identity narratives together rather than erase them; unified collective messaging retains varied lived perspectives while identifying shared systemic demands.

3.3 Key Insights for Readers and Practitioners

Shifts in Core Thinking

1. Abandon the siloed split between environmental action and racial/decolonial justice; reframe all climate voice-building as inherently requiring systemic analysis of colonial extractive capitalism as its foundational starting point.
2. Move past generic data-only climate communication and center personal diasporic and lived identity as the primary emotional and moral anchor of compelling, unignorable advocacy storytelling.
3. Reject the individual-solo activist myth that single testimony drives systemic change; build regular cross-community collective co-creation practice to cure widespread climate defeatism and generate broad cultural momentum.

Actionable Cross-Context Recommendations

1. Mandate a systemic interconnection mapping exercise before drafting any climate speech, spoken-word piece, or campaign messaging to avoid incomplete siloed framing.
2. Create safe structured sharing circles for identity narrative grounding to center marginalized voices that mainstream climate spaces typically exclude.
3. For all group climate campaigns, reserve dedicated workshop time for collective cross-community voice co-creation to prevent privileged elite narratives from dominating public advocacy output.

Long-Term Development Guidance

Sustained mastery of the Interwoven Voice Framework requires embedding the three sequential stages into permanent climate education and organizing workflows, rather than treating identity storytelling as a one-off public speaking exercise. Over multi-semester or multi-campaign practice, practitioners move beyond surface-level personal anecdotes to craft layered, systemic climate voice that bridges ecological and racial justice movements. Pair the framework with decolonial environmental justice reading to deepen Stage One systemic diagnosis capacity for long-term advocacy growth.

Section Four: Summary and Outlook

4.1 Summary of Core Viewpoints

Mainstream global climate discourse siloes ecological crisis from colonial extraction, white supremacy, and racial capitalism, silencing racialized and diasporic youth activists and perpetuating widespread climate defeatism rooted in elite narrow environmental framing. Fehinti Balogun’s 2022 TED Countdown Interwoven Voice Framework resolves this gap via a mandatory three-stage sequential decolonial methodology: interwoven systemic diagnosis mapping climate harm to extractive colonial systems, rooted diasporic identity narrative grounding to craft authentic advocacy storytelling, and cross-community collective voice co-creation to build unified intersectional climate messaging. Rooted in Balogun’s British-Nigerian theater and frontline climate organizing experience, the theory establishes that climate change functions merely as a symptom of white supremacist extractive capitalism, making systemic interconnection analysis the non-negotiable foundation of transformative climate voice. The model scales from solo artist spoken-word creation to large global youth summit campaign drafting, though it carries clear limitations for hyper-technical policy lobbying and requires baseline decolonial literacy for full implementation. Consistent adherence to the three sequential stages eliminates generic ecocentric climate messaging and restores marginalized activist agency to counter pervasive powerlessness narratives.

4.2 Future Development Trends and Outlook

Future Research Directions

Scholars will generate longitudinal empirical studies measuring shifts in climate audience engagement between messaging built with the Interwoven Voice Framework versus standard data-only climate communication, quantifying its equitable narrative impact across Global Majority and Western audiences. Additional cross-cultural comparative research will adapt the systemic diagnosis stage for Indigenous, Latin American, and Asian decolonial climate contexts, refining regional colonial extraction mapping tools. Cognitive and communications research will analyze how diasporic identity storytelling alters public perception of climate justice policy support relative to carbon-only statistical framing.

Emerging Industry and Movement Trends

Youth climate summit organizers and university environmental programs will integrate Balogun’s three-stage workshop curriculum as standard narrative training, phasing out outdated data-only public speaking coaching for student activists. Theater and digital arts climate collectives will adopt the individual creator branch as core performance development practice, expanding decolonial intersectional climate theater output globally. Corporate sustainability communications teams will phase out generic greenwashing climate marketing and adopt identity-rooted systemic narrative drafting to address colonial supply chain extraction accountability in public stakeholder messaging.

Unresolved New Challenges

Digital short-form social media climate content creates pressure to shorten systemic analysis, risking truncated Stage One diagnosis that dilutes the framework’s decolonial core. Rising polarization around racial justice climate framing creates audience pushback that practitioners must navigate without abandoning interwoven systemic analysis as their foundation. Uneven access to decolonial environmental education creates inequitable barriers for low-resource youth groups attempting to complete full three-stage framework implementation without trained facilitators or reference materials.

Section Five: References

1. Balogun, F. (2022, October). How to find your voice for climate action [TED Countdown YouTube Creator Summit Talk]. https://www.ted.com/talks/fehinti_balogun_how_to_find_your_voice_for_climate_action
2. Balogun, F. (2021). Can I Live? Hybrid Spoken-Word Theater Production, Complicité Theatre Collective. https://ourvillage.ifnotusthenwho.me/speaker/fehinti-balogun-2/
3. Trisos, C.H. et al. (2022). Intersectionality and climate vulnerability assessment, IPCC Working Group II Report. https://tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17565529.2025.2477105
4. Stir Arts Magazine. (2022). Can I Live? Hip-Hop Climate Theatre Centers Racial Diasporic Voice. https://www.createastir.ca/articles/can-i-live-york-the-cultch
5. Climate Reframe Directory. (2024). Fehinti Balogun Artist-Activist Profile & Workshop Overview. https://directory.climatereframe.co.uk/directory/member/fehinti-balogun
6. Taylor & Francis Youth Climate Research. (2022). Youth Climate Disempowerment and Marginalized Voice Erasure. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09540261.2126297
7. EE72 Interview. (2025). Fehinti Balogun on Diaspora Identity and Climate Organizing. https://ee72.com/fehinti-balogun-is-using-film-to-shift-the-conversation-around-climate/

Short Encouraging Learning Note

Start with a small personal systemic mapping exercise this week to connect your own lived experience to global colonial climate systems before drafting climate advocacy words. Explore Balogun’s Can I Live? theatrical work to witness how interwoven systemic analysis translates into powerful spoken-word climate voice.